Committed as obvious.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/md.texi: Fix incorrect pxref.
---
diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi
index
cc28f868fc85b5148450548a54d69a39ecc4f03a..c1d3ae2060d800bbaa9751fcf841d7417af1e37d
100644
--- a/gcc/doc/md.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi
@@ -9321,6 +9321,11 @@ so here's a silly made-up example:
"")
@end smallexample
+@noindent
+If we had not added the @code{(match_dup 4)} in the middle of the input
+sequence, it might have been the case that the register we chose at the
+beginning of the sequence is killed by the first or second @code{set}.
+
There are two special macros defined for use in the preparation statements:
@code{DONE} and @code{FAIL}. Use them with a following semicolon,
as a statement.
@@ -9348,11 +9353,6 @@ If the preparation falls through (invokes neither
@code{DONE} nor
@code{FAIL}), then the @code{define_peephole2} uses the replacement
template.
-@noindent
-If we had not added the @code{(match_dup 4)} in the middle of the input
-sequence, it might have been the case that the register we chose at the
-beginning of the sequence is killed by the first or second @code{set}.
-
@end ifset
@ifset INTERNALS
@node Insn Attributes
