> So the idea here is just to define the extension so that it gets defined > in the ISA strings and passed through to the assembler, right?
That will also define arch test marco: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/blob/master/riscv-c-api.md#architecture-extension-test-macro On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:20 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > On 11/8/22 20:00, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > These extensions were recently frozen [1]. As per Andrew's post [2] > > we're meant to ignore these in software, this just adds them to the list > > of allowed extensions and otherwise ignores them. I added these under > > SPEC_CLASS_NONE even though the PDF lists them as 20190614 because it > > seems pointless to add another spec class just to accept two extensions > > we then ignore. > > > > 1: > > https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/g/isa-dev/c/HZGoqP1eyps/m/GTNKRLJoAQAJ > > 2: > > https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/g/sw-dev/c/QKjQhChrq9Q/m/7gqdkctgAgAJ > > > > gcc/ChangeLog > > > > * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: Add Zihpm and Zicnttr > > extensions. > > So the idea here is just to define the extension so that it gets defined > in the ISA strings and passed through to the assembler, right? > > Jeff
