On 07/10/22 09:11 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
--- gcc/ipa-prop.h.jj 2022-05-25 11:07:29.516188277 +0200
+++ gcc/ipa-prop.h 2022-10-06 16:12:52.157055672 +0200
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct ipa_cst_ref_desc;
/* Structure holding data required to describe a constant jump function. */
struct GTY(()) ipa_constant_data
{
- /* THe value of the constant. */
+ /* The value of the constant. */
tree value;
/* Pointer to the structure that describes the reference. */
struct ipa_cst_ref_desc GTY((skip)) *rdesc;
--- gcc/value-range.cc.jj 2022-10-06 08:55:02.668291942 +0200
+++ gcc/value-range.cc 2022-10-06 16:12:17.161531334 +0200
@@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ irange::irange_contains_p (const irange
// Otherwise, check if this's pair occurs before R's.
if (wi::lt_p (wi::to_wide (u), wi::to_wide (rl), sign))
{
- // THere's still at leats one pair of R left.
+ // There's still at leats one pair of R left.
There's still at least one typo here ;-)
I'll push the attached as obvious.
commit 5c868666ce2014acf64d817dc31031deab1ecc93
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:20:36 2022
gcc: Fix comment typo
gcc/ChangeLog:
* value-range.cc (irange::irange_contains_p): Fix comment typo.
diff --git a/gcc/value-range.cc b/gcc/value-range.cc
index 16105f87678..a14f9bc4394 100644
--- a/gcc/value-range.cc
+++ b/gcc/value-range.cc
@@ -2509,7 +2509,7 @@ irange::irange_contains_p (const irange &r) const
// Otherwise, check if this's pair occurs before R's.
if (wi::lt_p (wi::to_wide (u), wi::to_wide (rl), sign))
{
- // There's still at leats one pair of R left.
+ // There's still at least one pair of R left.
if (++i >= num_pairs ())
return false;
l = m_base[i * 2];
