Hi! When looking at tree-inline.cc I've noticed a comment typo and grepped for similar typos elsewhere.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk as obvious. 2022-10-07 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> * ipa-prop.h (ipa_constant_data): Fix comment typo. * value-range.cc (irange::irange_contains_p): Likewise. * value-relation.cc (dom_oracle::set_one_relation): Likewise. * gimple-predicate-analysis.cc (predicate::simplify_4): Likewise. * tree-inline.cc (remap_ssa_name): Likewise. --- gcc/ipa-prop.h.jj 2022-05-25 11:07:29.516188277 +0200 +++ gcc/ipa-prop.h 2022-10-06 16:12:52.157055672 +0200 @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct ipa_cst_ref_desc; /* Structure holding data required to describe a constant jump function. */ struct GTY(()) ipa_constant_data { - /* THe value of the constant. */ + /* The value of the constant. */ tree value; /* Pointer to the structure that describes the reference. */ struct ipa_cst_ref_desc GTY((skip)) *rdesc; --- gcc/value-range.cc.jj 2022-10-06 08:55:02.668291942 +0200 +++ gcc/value-range.cc 2022-10-06 16:12:17.161531334 +0200 @@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ irange::irange_contains_p (const irange // Otherwise, check if this's pair occurs before R's. if (wi::lt_p (wi::to_wide (u), wi::to_wide (rl), sign)) { - // THere's still at leats one pair of R left. + // There's still at leats one pair of R left. if (++i >= num_pairs ()) return false; l = m_base[i * 2]; --- gcc/value-relation.cc.jj 2022-09-30 14:12:44.654058401 +0200 +++ gcc/value-relation.cc 2022-10-06 16:12:34.527295298 +0200 @@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ dom_oracle::set_one_relation (basic_bloc ptr->dump (dump_file); } // Check into whether we can simply replace the relation rather than - // intersecting it. THis may help with some optimistic iterative + // intersecting it. This may help with some optimistic iterative // updating algorithms. bool new_rel = ptr->intersect (vr); if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) --- gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc.jj 2022-09-09 12:27:28.259668112 +0200 +++ gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc 2022-10-06 16:11:36.676081607 +0200 @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ predicate::simplify_3 () /* Implement rule 4 for the OR predicate PREDS: 2) ((x AND y) != 0) OR (x != 0 AND y != 0) is equivalent to - (x != 0 ANd y != 0). */ + (x != 0 AND y != 0). */ bool predicate::simplify_4 () --- gcc/tree-inline.cc.jj 2022-05-30 14:07:02.191304381 +0200 +++ gcc/tree-inline.cc 2022-10-06 16:11:57.455799164 +0200 @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ remap_ssa_name (tree name, copy_body_dat n = id->decl_map->get (name); if (n) { - /* WHen we perform edge redirection as part of CFG copy, IPA-SRA can + /* When we perform edge redirection as part of CFG copy, IPA-SRA can remove an unused LHS from a call statement. Such LHS can however still appear in debug statements, but their value is lost in this function and we do not want to map them. */ Jakub