On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 08:43:26PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Slightly revised version, fixing some issues in mkoffload.cc. Otherwise, the
> same applies:
>
> On 25.08.22 19:30, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 25.08.22 16:54, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> The attached patch prepare for reverse-offload device->host
> function-address lookup by requesting (if needed) the on-device address.
>
>
> This patch adds the actual implementation for NVPTX.
>
> Having array[] = {fn1,fn2}; works with nvptx only since sm_35; hence,
> if there is a reverse_offload and sm_30 is used, there will be a compile-time
> error.
Wonder if we instead shouldn't arrange for silent request for no PTX
offloading (or one with warning?) if sm_30 and reverse offload is needed.
Error might be too harsh, the program can still offload to GCN or host
just fine...
Otherwise LGTM.
Jakub
