On 8/31/22 15:25, Martin Liška wrote: > On 8/31/22 15:19, Gaius Mulley wrote: >> Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> writes: >> >>> How do you mean that? You should ideally generate .rst (Sphinx markup) >>> instead of the *.texi files. These will be then included in the converted >>> Sphinx manual similarly to how you include it now to the Texinfo manual. >>> >>> Does it make sense? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Martin >> >> ah right - yes this makes sense. > > Goo! > >> I mistakenly thought the .rst files >> could be automatically generated from texinfo sources. In any case >> generating .rst directly will likely contain advantages, > > Yes, that's what I'm doing for the existing documentation, but the conversion > is not perfect and I had to make some manual changes to the emitted .rst > content. > > So please fix the crash I reported and I can convert GM2 texi manual.
Note I've just converted the current Modula-2 manual to RST (Sphinx): https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/ It contains some minor issues, but in general it should be pretty fine. Note pygments contains a corresponding lexer: https://pygments.org/docs/lexers/#multi-dialect-lexer-for-modula-2 Martin > > Cheers, > Martin > >> >> regards, >> Gaius >
