On 8/31/22 15:19, Gaius Mulley wrote: > Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> writes: > >> How do you mean that? You should ideally generate .rst (Sphinx markup) >> instead of the *.texi files. These will be then included in the converted >> Sphinx manual similarly to how you include it now to the Texinfo manual. >> >> Does it make sense? >> >> Cheers, >> Martin > > ah right - yes this makes sense.
Goo! > I mistakenly thought the .rst files > could be automatically generated from texinfo sources. In any case > generating .rst directly will likely contain advantages, Yes, that's what I'm doing for the existing documentation, but the conversion is not perfect and I had to make some manual changes to the emitted .rst content. So please fix the crash I reported and I can convert GM2 texi manual. Cheers, Martin > > regards, > Gaius
