Hi Segher & Peter, Thanks for your reviews!
on 2022/8/31 23:12, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 05:33:21PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: >> It's meant to update "lxv" to "p?lxv" and should leave the >> "lvx" unchanged. So this is to fix the typo accordingly. >> >> I'll push this soon if no objections. > > Please go ahead. Out of interest, did you see failures from this, was > it just by visual inspection, something else? > I did reproduce the failure for this test case on ppc64 P8 machine. :) For the other test cases updated by commit r12-2266, I did a quick visual inspection on them instead of actually testing them, there are some other typos but they have been fixed by r12-2889-g8464894c86b03e. To avoid some to escape, I just tested the other cases on ppc64 P8 and ppc64le P9 and P10, no failures were found. So committed as r13-2332-g023c5b36e47697. Thanks! BR, Kewen
