On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 05:33:21PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > It's meant to update "lxv" to "p?lxv" and should leave the > "lvx" unchanged. So this is to fix the typo accordingly. > > I'll push this soon if no objections.
Please go ahead. Out of interest, did you see failures from this, was it just by visual inspection, something else? Thanks, Segher
