On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 2:33 AM Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 2022-07-11T11:27:12+0200, I wrote:
> > [...], I've just pushed to master branch
> > commit 06b2a2abe26554c6f9365676683d67368cbba206
> > "Enhance '_Pragma' diagnostics verification in OMP C/C++ test cases"
>
> > --- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-5.c
> > +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-5.c
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ const int n = 100;
> > #define check_reduction(gwv_par, gwv_loop) \
> > { \
> > s1 = 2; s2 = 5; \
> > -DO_PRAGMA (acc parallel gwv_par copy (s1, s2)) \
> > +DO_PRAGMA (acc parallel gwv_par copy (s1, s2)) /* { dg-line DO_PRAGMA_loc
> > } */ \
> > DO_PRAGMA (acc loop gwv_loop reduction (+:s1, s2)) \
> > for (i = 0; i < n; i++) \
> > { \
> > @@ -45,8 +45,10 @@ main (void)
> >
> > /* Nvptx targets require a vector_length or 32 in to allow spinlocks with
> > gangs. */
> > - check_reduction (num_workers (nw) vector_length (vl), worker);
> > - /* { dg-warning "region is vector partitioned but does not contain
> > vector partitioned code" "test1" { target *-*-* } pragma_loc } */
> > + check_reduction (num_workers (nw) vector_length (vl), worker); /* {
> > dg-line check_reduction_loc }
> > + /* { dg-warning "22:region is vector partitioned but does not contain
> > vector partitioned code" "" { target *-*-* } pragma_loc }
> > + { dg-note "1:in expansion of macro 'DO_PRAGMA'" "" { target *-*-* }
> > DO_PRAGMA_loc }
> > + { dg-note "3:in expansion of macro 'check_reduction'" "" { target
> > *-*-* } check_reduction_loc } */
>
> Oh my, PR101551 "[offloading] Differences in diagnostics etc."
> strikes again... The latter two 'note' diagnostics are currently
> only emitted in non-offloading configurations. I've now pushed to
> master branch commit 3723aedaad20a129741c2f6f3c22b3dd1220a3fc
> "XFAIL 'offloading_enabled' diagnostics issue in
> 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-5.c' [PR101551]", see attached.
>
Would you mind please confirming how I need to run configure in order
to get this configuration? Then I can look into why the difference in
location information there. Thanks....
-Lewis
