On 7/1/22 08:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:42 AM Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/30/22 08:43, Rui Ueyama wrote:
>>> Thanks Martin for creating this patch.
>>
>> You're welcome.
>>
>>>
>>> Here is a preliminary change for the mold side: 
>>> https://github.com/rui314/mold/commit/9ad49d1c556bc963d06cca8233535183490de605
>>>  
>>> <https://github.com/rui314/mold/commit/9ad49d1c556bc963d06cca8233535183490de605>
>>>
>>> Overall the API is looking fine,
>>
>> Good then!
>>
>>> though it is not clear what kind of value is expected as a linker version. 
>>> A linker version is not a single unsigned integer but something like 
>>> "1.3.0". Something like "1.3.0-rc2" can also be a linker version. So I 
>>> don't think we can represent a linker version as a single integer.
>>
>> Well, you can use the same what we use GCC_VERSION (plugin_version):
>>
>> 1000 * MAJOR + MINOR
>>
>> Let me adjust the documentation of the API.
> 
> Hmm, but then why not go back to the original suggestion merging
> linker_identifier and linker_version into
> a single string.  That of course puts the burden of parsing to the
> consumer - still that's probably better
> than imposing the constraint of encoding the version in an unsigned
> integer.  Alternatively easing
> parsing by separating out the version in a string would be possible as
> well (but then you'd have
> to care for 1.3.0-rc2+gitab4316174 or so, not sure what the advantage
> over putting everything in
> the identifier would be).

I'm fine with the suggested 2 strings (linker_identifier and linker_version).

Does it work for you Rui?

Cheers,
Martin

> 
> You usually cannot rely on a version anyway since distributors usually
> apply patches.
> 
>> Richi: May I install the patch?
> 
> Let's sort out the version thing and consider simplifying the API.
> 
> Richard.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 9:01 PM Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz 
>>> <mailto:mli...@suse.cz>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     On 6/20/22 11:35, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>     > I think this is OK.  Can we get buy-in from mold people?
>>>
>>>     Sure, I've just pinged Rui:
>>>     https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/454#issuecomment-1160419030 
>>> <https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/454#issuecomment-1160419030>
>>>
>>>     Martin
>>>

Reply via email to