Hi Jakub, Sorry for the rush of emails, I removed the Copyright part, I will use DCO. Note: I filled out the form.
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 2:55 PM Mohamed Atef <mohamedatef1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 2:43 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 02:10:29PM +0200, Mohamed Atef wrote: >> > > As I said earlier, as this is just partial implementation of the >> > > OMPD, I think it would be better to commit it to a git branch but >> > > already in the upstream repository, say devel/omp/ompd branch. >> > > >> > > Do you have a FSF Copyright assignment on file or do you want to >> > > submit this under DCO (https://gcc.gnu.org/dco.html)? >> > >> > If the latter, should I remove the header comment? >> > I mean this part " Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> > Contributed by Mohamed Atef <mohamedatef1...@gmail.com>. >> " >> > In fact, I don't know the difference, so which is better for the >> community? >> > > Getting the FSF Copyright assignment can take a while, in the past it >> involved sending snail mail papers and could take a few weeks or more, >> I think nowadays it is through email but still can take some time. >> The DCO is described in the link above. >> >> As for the Copyright line, I must say I don't know, >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-June/236217.html >> says that it probably should be just >> Copyright The GNU Toolchain Authors. >> > I don't have FSF Copyright, I just copied the comment as I thought it's > some standard. > I will change it to "Copyright The GNU Toolchain Authors". > >> in that case, but we have the DCO option only for less than a year >> and apparently no file has such a Copyright line. >> >> If you wish to use FSF Copyright assignment, somebody needs to mail you >> details that you fill in and mail to FSF. >> >> I will use DCO, we have less than 2 months to finish the project. > >> Jakub >> > Mohamed >
