On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 2:43 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 02:10:29PM +0200, Mohamed Atef wrote: > > > As I said earlier, as this is just partial implementation of the > > > OMPD, I think it would be better to commit it to a git branch but > > > already in the upstream repository, say devel/omp/ompd branch. > > > > > > Do you have a FSF Copyright assignment on file or do you want to > > > submit this under DCO (https://gcc.gnu.org/dco.html)? > > > > If the latter, should I remove the header comment? > > I mean this part " Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > Contributed by Mohamed Atef <mohamedatef1...@gmail.com>. " > > In fact, I don't know the difference, so which is better for the > community? > Getting the FSF Copyright assignment can take a while, in the past it > involved sending snail mail papers and could take a few weeks or more, > I think nowadays it is through email but still can take some time. > The DCO is described in the link above. > > As for the Copyright line, I must say I don't know, > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-June/236217.html > says that it probably should be just > Copyright The GNU Toolchain Authors. > I don't have FSF Copyright, I just copied the comment as I thought it's some standard. I will change it to "Copyright The GNU Toolchain Authors". > in that case, but we have the DCO option only for less than a year > and apparently no file has such a Copyright line. > > If you wish to use FSF Copyright assignment, somebody needs to mail you > details that you fill in and mail to FSF. > > I will use DCO, we have less than 2 months to finish the project. > Jakub > Mohamed
