On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:49:42AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Thoughts on this part?
Either place is fine. > > > +<tr><td>Map-order clarifications</td><td>GCC?</td><td></td></tr> > > This entry I gave up on, it isn't exactly clear to me what that > > bullet is about and once we figure that out, we need to do some archeology > > on whether we support it at all and if yes, since which commit and thus > > since which GCC version. > I concur – but the question is how to handle it now? Leave it and > correct it later? Comment/remove it? Write ? in the Version column alone instead of GCC? and in comment say To be verified or something similar. BTW, it would be really nice to use colors like https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html uses, use just GCC versions instead of GCC version and No instead of N and use hyperlinks to changes.html OpenMP ids (or just changes.html if we don't have an id). And, for No we could in the future hyperlink to bugzilla if we file PRs for those missing or WIP features which people can assign etc. But that can be changed incrementally. > Can you check whether you now like the bullet points? If so, I will > update the .texi to match. LGTM. Jakub
