This testcase does not generate anywhere near optimal code for 32-bit
code. For p10 it actually now fails this testcase, after the previous
patch. Let's xfail it.
2022-04-21 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/103197
PR target/102146
* gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c: Add xfail on scan-assembler for -m32.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c
index b3f923eea848..0ed2a7bd1d25 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bswap-brw.c
@@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ bswap_int_dbl (unsigned int a)
/* Force the value to be loaded into a vector register. */
__asm__ (" # %x0" : "+wa" (b));
- /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\mxxbrw\M} } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\mxxbrw\M} {xfail {has_arch_pwr10 && {!
has_arch_ppc64}}} } } */
return (double) __builtin_bswap32 (b);
}
--
1.8.3.1
