On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:07 AM Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 10:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 7:39 PM Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches
> > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > 'inf/inf' should raise an invalid operation exception at runtime.
> > > So it
> > > should not be folded during compilation unless -fno-trapping-math is
> > > used.
> >
> > I wonder if it would make sense to handle it similar to
> >
> >       inexact = real_arithmetic (&value, code, &d1, &d2);
> >       real_convert (&result, mode, &value);
> >
> >       /* Don't constant fold this floating point operation if
> >          the result has overflowed and flag_trapping_math.  */
> >       if (flag_trapping_math
> >           && MODE_HAS_INFINITIES (mode)
> >           && REAL_VALUE_ISINF (result)
> >           && !REAL_VALUE_ISINF (d1)
> >           && !REAL_VALUE_ISINF (d2))
> >         return NULL_TREE;
>
> > thus whenever we fold to NaN but flag_trapping_math is set,
> > do not fold?
>
> Like this?
>
>        inexact = real_arithmetic (&value, code, &d1, &d2);
>        real_convert (&result, mode, &value);
>
> +      /* Don't constant fold this floating point operation if
> +        both operands are not NaN but the result is NaN, and
> +        flag_trapping_math.  Such operations should raise an
> +        invalid operation exception.  */
> +      if (flag_trapping_math
> +         && MODE_HAS_NANS (mode)
> +         && REAL_VALUE_ISNAN (result)
> +         && !REAL_VALUE_ISNAN (d1)
> +         && !REAL_VALUE_ISNAN (d2))
> +       return NULL_TREE;
> +
>        /* Don't constant fold this floating point operation if
>          the result has overflowed and flag_trapping_math.  */
>        if (flag_trapping_math
>
> > We already exclude NaN operands earlier
> > (but unconditionally return NaN even for NaN + 1. though
> > that should raise invalid as well, no?)
>
> qNaN + 1 (or even qNaN + qNaN) should produce a qNaN but should not
> raise any exception. OTOH sNaN + 1 should produce a qNaN and raise an
> invalid operation exception.

Ah, I see.  So yes, like that.

Joseph, do you agree?

Thanks,
Richard.

>  For sNaN operands we already ruled out the
> const folding earlier:
>
> >       /* Don't perform operation if we honor signaling NaNs and
> >          either operand is a signaling NaN.  */
> >       if (HONOR_SNANS (mode)
> >           && (REAL_VALUE_ISSIGNALING_NAN (d1)
> >               || REAL_VALUE_ISSIGNALING_NAN (d2)))
> >         return NULL_TREE;
>
> > I suppose Joseph should know best what the correct semantics
> > are here.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard.
> >
> > > gcc/
> > >         PR middle-end/95115
> > >         * fold-const.cc (const_binop): Do not fold "inf/inf".
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite
> > >         * gcc.dg/pr95115.c: New test.
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/fold-const.cc              |  8 ++++++++
> > >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> > > index fd9c6352d4f..0e99d5a2e3d 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> > > @@ -1283,6 +1283,14 @@ const_binop (enum tree_code code, tree arg1,
> > > tree arg2)
> > >           && (flag_trapping_math || ! MODE_HAS_INFINITIES (mode)))
> > >         return NULL_TREE;
> > >
> > > +      /* Don't perform "inf/inf", because it would raise an invalid
> > > +        operation exception (IEEE 754 section 7.2 clause d).  */
> > > +      if (code == RDIV_EXPR
> > > +         && flag_trapping_math
> > > +         && REAL_VALUE_ISINF (d1)
> > > +         && REAL_VALUE_ISINF (d2))
> > > +       return NULL_TREE;
> > > +
> > >        /* If either operand is a NaN, just return it.  Otherwise,
> > > set up
> > >          for floating-point trap; we return an overflow.  */
> > >        if (REAL_VALUE_ISNAN (d1))
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..46a95dfb698
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> > > +/* { dg-do run } */
> > > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftrapping-math" } */
> > > +/* { dg-add-options ieee } */
> > > +/* { dg-require-effective-target fenv_exceptions } */
> > > +
> > > +#include <fenv.h>
> > > +#include <stdlib.h>
> > > +
> > > +double
> > > +x (void)
> > > +{
> > > +  double d = __builtin_inf ();
> > > +  return d / d;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int
> > > +main (void)
> > > +{
> > > +  double r = x ();
> > > +  if (!__builtin_isnan (r))
> > > +       abort ();
> > > +  if (!fetestexcept (FE_INVALID))
> > > +       abort ();
> > > +  exit (0);
> > > +}
> > > --
> > > 2.35.1
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang>
> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

Reply via email to