On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 10:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 7:39 PM Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 'inf/inf' should raise an invalid operation exception at runtime. 
> > So it
> > should not be folded during compilation unless -fno-trapping-math is
> > used.
> 
> I wonder if it would make sense to handle it similar to
> 
>       inexact = real_arithmetic (&value, code, &d1, &d2);
>       real_convert (&result, mode, &value);
> 
>       /* Don't constant fold this floating point operation if
>          the result has overflowed and flag_trapping_math.  */
>       if (flag_trapping_math
>           && MODE_HAS_INFINITIES (mode)
>           && REAL_VALUE_ISINF (result)
>           && !REAL_VALUE_ISINF (d1)
>           && !REAL_VALUE_ISINF (d2))
>         return NULL_TREE;

> thus whenever we fold to NaN but flag_trapping_math is set,
> do not fold?

Like this?

       inexact = real_arithmetic (&value, code, &d1, &d2);
       real_convert (&result, mode, &value);
 
+      /* Don't constant fold this floating point operation if
+        both operands are not NaN but the result is NaN, and
+        flag_trapping_math.  Such operations should raise an
+        invalid operation exception.  */
+      if (flag_trapping_math
+         && MODE_HAS_NANS (mode)
+         && REAL_VALUE_ISNAN (result)
+         && !REAL_VALUE_ISNAN (d1)
+         && !REAL_VALUE_ISNAN (d2))
+       return NULL_TREE;
+
       /* Don't constant fold this floating point operation if
         the result has overflowed and flag_trapping_math.  */
       if (flag_trapping_math

> We already exclude NaN operands earlier
> (but unconditionally return NaN even for NaN + 1. though
> that should raise invalid as well, no?)

qNaN + 1 (or even qNaN + qNaN) should produce a qNaN but should not
raise any exception. OTOH sNaN + 1 should produce a qNaN and raise an
invalid operation exception.  For sNaN operands we already ruled out the
const folding earlier:

>       /* Don't perform operation if we honor signaling NaNs and
>          either operand is a signaling NaN.  */
>       if (HONOR_SNANS (mode)
>           && (REAL_VALUE_ISSIGNALING_NAN (d1)
>               || REAL_VALUE_ISSIGNALING_NAN (d2)))
>         return NULL_TREE;

> I suppose Joseph should know best what the correct semantics
> are here.
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard.
> 
> > gcc/
> >         PR middle-end/95115
> >         * fold-const.cc (const_binop): Do not fold "inf/inf".
> > 
> > gcc/testsuite
> >         * gcc.dg/pr95115.c: New test.
> > ---
> >  gcc/fold-const.cc              |  8 ++++++++
> >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> > index fd9c6352d4f..0e99d5a2e3d 100644
> > --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> > @@ -1283,6 +1283,14 @@ const_binop (enum tree_code code, tree arg1,
> > tree arg2)
> >           && (flag_trapping_math || ! MODE_HAS_INFINITIES (mode)))
> >         return NULL_TREE;
> > 
> > +      /* Don't perform "inf/inf", because it would raise an invalid
> > +        operation exception (IEEE 754 section 7.2 clause d).  */
> > +      if (code == RDIV_EXPR
> > +         && flag_trapping_math
> > +         && REAL_VALUE_ISINF (d1)
> > +         && REAL_VALUE_ISINF (d2))
> > +       return NULL_TREE;
> > +
> >        /* If either operand is a NaN, just return it.  Otherwise,
> > set up
> >          for floating-point trap; we return an overflow.  */
> >        if (REAL_VALUE_ISNAN (d1))
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..46a95dfb698
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr95115.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> > +/* { dg-do run } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftrapping-math" } */
> > +/* { dg-add-options ieee } */
> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target fenv_exceptions } */
> > +
> > +#include <fenv.h>
> > +#include <stdlib.h>
> > +
> > +double
> > +x (void)
> > +{
> > +  double d = __builtin_inf ();
> > +  return d / d;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +main (void)
> > +{
> > +  double r = x ();
> > +  if (!__builtin_isnan (r))
> > +       abort ();
> > +  if (!fetestexcept (FE_INVALID))
> > +       abort ();
> > +  exit (0);
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> > 
> > 

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

Reply via email to