> > That's a good point, but ISA_SPEC_CLASS_FROZEN_2021 is hard to > > reference to which spec, so I would prefer to add a -misa-spec=2021 to > > align platform/profile spec, and then ISA_SPEC_CLASS_2021, and before > > RISC-V platform/profile spec has released, let keep > > ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE :p > > For sure we cannot reference a spec that is not frozen yet (i.e. > platform/profile). > ISA_SPEC_CLASS_FROZEN_2021 was a proposal for all groups of ISA extensions > that have been frozen in 2021 (zb*, zk*, etc.) and will eventually be > ratified. > But yes, keeping NONE until the specifications are ratified and change > the specification > class then is also possible.
I expect those specs can be ratified at the end of this year, and then we still have a few months to update before GCC 12 release.
