On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:45 PM abebeos <lazaridis.com+abeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The bounty was filed/advertised by the gcc project, so the gcc project should > have intervened immediately at the point where an anonymous coward rigged the > voting process (aborted the vote before end of the voting period). > > The fact that I need to explain this is quite a tragedy.
I've already done my best to explain the distinction between GCC and Bountysource. You are blaming the wrong people here. The bounty was not filed by the GCC project. It was not advertised by the GCC project. I know nothing about the Bountysource voting process because it has nothing to do with GCC. The fact that people associated in some way with the bounty process commented on a GCC bug report does not mean that the GCC project had anything to do with the bounty. Ian
