On Mon, May 10, 2021, 9:52 AM abebeos <lazaridis.com+abeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Again, just heavily fascinating to see how you ignore the overall essence > of this, which is of course directly related to gcc. > > (bountysource is just a secondary disaster, it all starts here, at gcc. > What do you think that the GCC project has done wrong for this specific issue? In answering please do not mention anything about bounties or Bountysource, as those have nothing to do with the GCC project. Ian >
