Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:51:03PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Fixed, thanks for catching that (and the "r" -> "=r"; I've
>> actually tested a patch that didn't have any constraints on the first
>> define_insn because I started with a define_split that didn't work,
>> and it happened to work during testing, only noticed I've missed them
>> afterwards.
>
>> or it could be:
>>   "UINTVAL (operands[3]) < 32
>>    && UINTVAL (operands[3]) + UINTVAL (operands[4]) == 32
>>    && INTVAL (operands[3]) == INTVAL (operands[5])"
>
> Here is an updated patch that I've also successfully bootstrapped/regtested
> on aarch64-linux.
>
> 2021-04-16  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
>
>       PR target/100075
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*neg_asr_si2_extr, *extrsi5_insn_di): New
>       define_insn patterns.
>
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/pr100075.c: New test.

OK, thanks.

Richard

> --- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md.jj  2021-04-15 10:45:02.798853095 +0200
> +++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md     2021-04-15 13:28:04.734754364 +0200
> @@ -3572,6 +3572,18 @@ (define_insn "*neg_<shift>_si2_uxtw"
>    [(set_attr "autodetect_type" "alu_shift_<shift>_op2")]
>  )
>  
> +(define_insn "*neg_asr_si2_extr"
> +  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> +     (neg:SI (match_operator:SI 4 "subreg_lowpart_operator"
> +               [(sign_extract:DI
> +                  (match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "r")
> +                  (match_operand 3 "aarch64_simd_shift_imm_offset_si" "n")
> +                  (match_operand 2 "aarch64_simd_shift_imm_offset_si" 
> "n"))])))]
> +  "INTVAL (operands[2]) + INTVAL (operands[3]) == 32"
> +  "neg\\t%w0, %w1, asr %2"
> +  [(set_attr "autodetect_type" "alu_shift_asr_op2")]
> +)
> +
>  (define_insn "mul<mode>3"
>    [(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
>       (mult:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
> @@ -5382,6 +5394,22 @@ (define_insn "*extrsi5_insn_uxtw_alt"
>    "extr\\t%w0, %w1, %w2, %4"
>    [(set_attr "type" "rotate_imm")]
>  )
> +
> +(define_insn "*extrsi5_insn_di"
> +  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> +     (ior:SI (ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
> +                        (match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
> +             (match_operator:SI 6 "subreg_lowpart_operator"
> +               [(zero_extract:DI
> +                  (match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand" "r")
> +                  (match_operand 5 "const_int_operand" "n")
> +                  (match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))])))]
> +  "UINTVAL (operands[3]) < 32
> +   && UINTVAL (operands[3]) + UINTVAL (operands[4]) == 32
> +   && INTVAL (operands[3]) == INTVAL (operands[5])"
> +  "extr\\t%w0, %w1, %w2, %4"
> +  [(set_attr "type" "rotate_imm")]
> +)
>  
>  (define_insn "*ror<mode>3_insn"
>    [(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr100075.c.jj    2021-04-15 
> 13:23:31.188852983 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr100075.c       2021-04-15 
> 13:23:10.612086048 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/* PR target/100075 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tsbfx\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, 16, 16} } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tneg\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, asr 16} } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\textr\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, 16} } } */
> +
> +struct S { short x, y; };
> +
> +struct S
> +f1 (struct S p)
> +{
> +  return (struct S) { -p.y, p.x };
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +f2 (struct S p)
> +{
> +  return (struct S) { p.y, -p.x };
> +}
>
>
>       Jakub

Reply via email to