On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:51:03PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Fixed, thanks for catching that (and the "r" -> "=r"; I've
> actually tested a patch that didn't have any constraints on the first
> define_insn because I started with a define_split that didn't work,
> and it happened to work during testing, only noticed I've missed them
> afterwards.

> or it could be:
>   "UINTVAL (operands[3]) < 32
>    && UINTVAL (operands[3]) + UINTVAL (operands[4]) == 32
>    && INTVAL (operands[3]) == INTVAL (operands[5])"

Here is an updated patch that I've also successfully bootstrapped/regtested
on aarch64-linux.

2021-04-16  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/100075
        * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*neg_asr_si2_extr, *extrsi5_insn_di): New
        define_insn patterns.

        * gcc.target/aarch64/pr100075.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md.jj    2021-04-15 10:45:02.798853095 +0200
+++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md       2021-04-15 13:28:04.734754364 +0200
@@ -3572,6 +3572,18 @@ (define_insn "*neg_<shift>_si2_uxtw"
   [(set_attr "autodetect_type" "alu_shift_<shift>_op2")]
 )
 
+(define_insn "*neg_asr_si2_extr"
+  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+       (neg:SI (match_operator:SI 4 "subreg_lowpart_operator"
+                 [(sign_extract:DI
+                    (match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+                    (match_operand 3 "aarch64_simd_shift_imm_offset_si" "n")
+                    (match_operand 2 "aarch64_simd_shift_imm_offset_si" 
"n"))])))]
+  "INTVAL (operands[2]) + INTVAL (operands[3]) == 32"
+  "neg\\t%w0, %w1, asr %2"
+  [(set_attr "autodetect_type" "alu_shift_asr_op2")]
+)
+
 (define_insn "mul<mode>3"
   [(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
        (mult:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r")
@@ -5382,6 +5394,22 @@ (define_insn "*extrsi5_insn_uxtw_alt"
   "extr\\t%w0, %w1, %w2, %4"
   [(set_attr "type" "rotate_imm")]
 )
+
+(define_insn "*extrsi5_insn_di"
+  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+       (ior:SI (ashift:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
+                          (match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" "n"))
+               (match_operator:SI 6 "subreg_lowpart_operator"
+                 [(zero_extract:DI
+                    (match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand" "r")
+                    (match_operand 5 "const_int_operand" "n")
+                    (match_operand 4 "const_int_operand" "n"))])))]
+  "UINTVAL (operands[3]) < 32
+   && UINTVAL (operands[3]) + UINTVAL (operands[4]) == 32
+   && INTVAL (operands[3]) == INTVAL (operands[5])"
+  "extr\\t%w0, %w1, %w2, %4"
+  [(set_attr "type" "rotate_imm")]
+)
 
 (define_insn "*ror<mode>3_insn"
   [(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr100075.c.jj      2021-04-15 
13:23:31.188852983 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr100075.c 2021-04-15 13:23:10.612086048 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* PR target/100075 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tsbfx\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, 16, 16} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tneg\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, asr 16} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\textr\tw[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, 16} } } */
+
+struct S { short x, y; };
+
+struct S
+f1 (struct S p)
+{
+  return (struct S) { -p.y, p.x };
+}
+
+struct S
+f2 (struct S p)
+{
+  return (struct S) { p.y, -p.x };
+}


        Jakub

Reply via email to