[committed] testsuite: XFAIL two insv_1.c tests [PR87763]

[Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches]

This patch XFAILs the remaining regressions in PR87763.  We should
still fix them at some point, but that's not GCC 11 material.

Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, pushed to trunk.

Richard


gcc/testsuite/
        PR target/87763
        * gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c: XFAIL two scan tests.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c
index 9efa22e649d..a1d26b0136b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/insv_1.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ typedef struct bitfield
 bitfield
 bfi1 (bitfield a)
 {
-  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 0, 8" } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 0, 8" { xfail 
*-*-* } } } */
   a.eight = 3;
   return a;
 }
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ bfi1 (bitfield a)
 bitfield
 bfi2 (bitfield a)
 {
-  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 16, 5" } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bfi\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 16, 5" { xfail 
*-*-* } } } */
   a.five = 7;
   return a;
 }