For the reasons discussed in PR78314, ieee_support_halting doesn't work correctly for arm* and aarch64*. I think the easiest thing is to skip these tests until the PR is fixed.
This doesn't mean that the PR is unimportant. It just doesn't seem useful to have the unpredictable failures described in the PR trail given that the problem is known and has been analysed. Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, pushed to trunk. Richard gcc/testsuite/ PR libfortran/78314 * gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90: Skip for arm* and aarch64*. * gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_8.f90: Likewise. --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90 | 1 + gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_8.f90 | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90 index 96ceaff09b0..1af7ed395b0 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ ! { dg-do run } +! { dg-skip-if "PR libfortran/78314" { aarch64*-*-gnu* arm*-*-gnueabi arm*-*-gnueabihf } } ! ! This test will fail on older x86_64 glibc (< 2.20), due to this bug: ! https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16198 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_8.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_8.f90 index d847b1b3eee..4a1158178ef 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_8.f90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_8.f90 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -! { dg-do run { xfail aarch64*-*-gnu* arm*-*-gnueabi arm*-*-gnueabihf } } -! XFAIL because of PR libfortran/78449. +! { dg-do run } +! { dg-skip-if "PR libfortran/78314" { aarch64*-*-gnu* arm*-*-gnueabi arm*-*-gnueabihf } } module foo use :: ieee_exceptions