Hi,
this is a regression present on the mainline and 10 branch for architectures
that pass all structure types by reference, e.g. 32-bit PowerPC or SPARC.
Jakub posted a detailed analysis in the audit trail and this boils down to
the RTL expander trying to take the address of a DECL whose RTX is a register.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86-64/Linux, PowerPC64/Linux and SPARC/Solaris,
OK for the mainline and 10 branch?
2021-03-08 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR C++/90448
* calls.c (initialize_argument_information): When the argument
is passed by reference, do not make a copy in a thunk only if
the argument is already in memory. Remove redundant test for
the case of callee copy.
--
Eric Botcazou
diff --git a/gcc/calls.c b/gcc/calls.c
index 1fea022ad8a..ff606204772 100644
--- a/gcc/calls.c
+++ b/gcc/calls.c
@@ -2388,19 +2388,17 @@ initialize_argument_information (int num_actuals ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
function_arg_info arg (type, argpos < n_named_args);
if (pass_by_reference (args_so_far_pnt, arg))
{
- bool callee_copies;
- tree base = NULL_TREE;
-
- callee_copies = reference_callee_copied (args_so_far_pnt, arg);
-
- /* If we're compiling a thunk, pass through invisible references
- instead of making a copy. */
- if (call_from_thunk_p
- || (callee_copies
- && !TREE_ADDRESSABLE (type)
- && (base = get_base_address (args[i].tree_value))
- && TREE_CODE (base) != SSA_NAME
- && (!DECL_P (base) || MEM_P (DECL_RTL (base)))))
+ const bool callee_copies
+ = reference_callee_copied (args_so_far_pnt, arg);
+ tree base;
+
+ /* If we're compiling a thunk, pass directly the address of an object
+ already in memory, instead of making a copy. Likewise if we want
+ to make the copy in the callee instead of the caller. */
+ if ((call_from_thunk_p || callee_copies)
+ && (base = get_base_address (args[i].tree_value))
+ && TREE_CODE (base) != SSA_NAME
+ && (!DECL_P (base) || MEM_P (DECL_RTL (base))))
{
/* We may have turned the parameter value into an SSA name.
Go back to the original parameter so we can take the