On Jan 25, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Greta Yorsh wrote: > The test gcc.target/arm/di-longlong64-sync-withldrexd.c fails on > arm-none-eabi target, because gcc generates 48 LDREXD and 48 STREXD > instructions instead of the expected 46. > > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/di-longlong64-sync-withldrexd.c scan-assembler-times > tldrexd 46 > FAIL: gcc.target/arm/di-longlong64-sync-withldrexd.c scan-assembler-times > tstrexd 46
> The regression PASS->FAIL was introduced for target arm-none-eabi in the > first week of November 2011. Gosh, that seems like a long time to notice and adjust the testcase for a port that seems popular enough and has a nice representation around here. :-( > * gcc.target/arm/di-longlong64-sync-withldrexd.c: Please say slightly more than this. Also, if you mean to ask for a review, please include an Ok? in there. I'll assume you meant to ask for a review. Ok. If you aren't absolutely sure about the codegen or have an doubts, please ping an arm person for review of the codegen.
