Thanks for raising the issue. To me the above looks like a
straightforward typo, which we should fix as soon as possible (not
sure whether we could also diagnose it).
Jason, Jakub, can you confirm?
While we can change it, it is certainly valid as is, #pragma GCC visibility
can happen in lots of places and just marks where the default visibility
is adjusted.
Indeed, thanks for clarifying. In the specific case of libsupc++ I guess
it's essentially a matter of style / consistency the exact line. We can
schedule the change for Stage 1.
If clang errors on this, it is broken.
Ehm, agreed.
Paolo.
