2012/1/20 Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com>:
> 2012/1/20 Dominique Dhumieres <domi...@lps.ens.fr>:
>> Kai,
>>
>> I think there is a typo in the test g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C causing
>> a regression:
>>
>> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O1 (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess
>> errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -Os (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
>> -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
>> -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
>>
>> Using the original test for the pr, i.e.,
>>
>> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C 2012-01-20
>> 00:02:03.000000000 +0100
>> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C 2012-01-20
>> 10:48:07.000000000 +0100
>> @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
>> /* { dg-do compile } */
>> +class A;
>> +
>> template <class T>
>> class B
>> {
>>
>> the test passes.
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Dominique
>
> Duh, I will correct it ASAP.
>
> Thanks,
> Kai
Fixed.
