2012/1/20 Dominique Dhumieres <domi...@lps.ens.fr>:
> Kai,
>
> I think there is a typo in the test g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C causing
> a regression:
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O0 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O1 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess
> errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -Os (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
> -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
> -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
>
> Using the original test for the pr, i.e.,
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C 2012-01-20
> 00:02:03.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C 2012-01-20 10:48:07.000000000
> +0100
> @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> +class A;
> +
> template <class T>
> class B
> {
>
> the test passes.
>
> TIA
>
> Dominique
Duh, I will correct it ASAP.
Thanks,
Kai
