Ping, please ? Thanks in advance,
Olivier > On 15 Oct 2020, at 08:38, Olivier Hainque <hain...@adacore.com> wrote: > > Ping, please ? > > Patch re-attached for convenience. > > Thanks in advance! > > Best Regards, > > Olivier > >> On 24 Sep 2020, at 11:46, Olivier Hainque <hain...@adacore.com> wrote: >> >> Re-proposing this patch after re-testing with a recent >> mainline on on aarch64-linux (bootstrap and regression test >> with --enable-languages=all), and more than a year of in-house >> use in production for a few aarch64 ports on a gcc-9 base. >> >> The change moves the definitions of PROBE_STACK_FIRST_REG >> and PROBE_STACK_SECOND_REG to a more appropriate place for such >> items (here, in aarch64.md as suggested by Richard), and adjusts >> their value from r9/r10 to r10/r11 to free r9 for a possibly >> more general purpose (e.g. as a static chain at least on targets >> which have a private use of r18, such as Windows or Vxworks). >> >> OK to commit? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> With Kind Regards, >> >> Olivier >> >> 2020-11-07 Olivier Hainque <hain...@adacore.com> >> >> * config/aarch64/aarch64.md: Define PROBE_STACK_FIRST_REGNUM >> and PROBE_STACK_SECOND_REGNUM constants, designating r10/r11. >> Replacements for the PROBE_STACK_FIRST/SECOND_REG constants in >> aarch64.c. >> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (PROBE_STACK_FIRST_REG): Remove. >> (PROBE_STACK_SECOND_REG): Remove. >> (aarch64_emit_probe_stack_range): Adjust to the _REG -> _REGNUM >> suffix update for PROBE_STACK register numbers. > > <aarch64-regnum.txt>
