Ping. Are these testsuite fixes for ILP32 OK?

On 18/09/2020 17:15, Alex Coplan wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
> 
> On 08/09/2020 10:14, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 11:00, Alex Coplan <alex.cop...@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         * config/aarch64/aarch64.md
> > >         (*adds_<optab><ALLX:mode>_<GPI:mode>): Ensure extended operand
> > >         agrees with width of extension specifier.
> > >         (*subs_<optab><ALLX:mode>_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
> > >         (*adds_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shift_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
> > >         (*subs_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shift_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
> > >         (*add_<optab><ALLX:mode>_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
> > >         (*add_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shft_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
> > >         (*add_uxt<mode>_shift2): Likewise.
> > >         (*sub_<optab><ALLX:mode>_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
> > >         (*sub_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shft_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
> > >         (*sub_uxt<mode>_shift2): Likewise.
> > >         (*cmp_swp_<optab><ALLX:mode>_reg<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
> > >         (*cmp_swp_<optab><ALLX:mode>_shft_<GPI:mode>): Likewise.
> > >
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         * gcc.target/aarch64/adds3.c: Fix test w.r.t. new syntax.
> > >         * gcc.target/aarch64/cmp.c: Likewise.
> > >         * gcc.target/aarch64/subs3.c: Likewise.
> > >         * gcc.target/aarch64/subsp.c: Likewise.
> > >         * gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c: New test.
> > >
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've noticed some of the new tests fail with -mabi=ilp32:
> >     gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c check-function-bodies add1
> >     gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c check-function-bodies add3
> >     gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c check-function-bodies sub2
> >     gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c check-function-bodies sub3
> >     gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c scan-assembler-times
> > subs\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, w[0-9]+, sxtw 3 1
> >     gcc.target/aarch64/subsp.c scan-assembler sub\tsp, sp, w[0-9]*, sxtw 4\n
> > 
> > Christophe
> 
> AFAICT the second scan-assembler in that subsp test failed on ILP32
> before my commit. This is because we generate slightly suboptimal code
> here. On LP64 with -O, we get:
> 
> f2:
>         stp     x29, x30, [sp, -16]!
>         mov     x29, sp
>         add     w1, w1, 1
>         sub     sp, sp, x1, sxtw 4
>         mov     x0, sp
>         bl      foo
>         mov     sp, x29
>         ldp     x29, x30, [sp], 16
>         ret
> 
> On ILP32, we get:
> 
> f2:
>         stp     x29, x30, [sp, -16]!
>         mov     x29, sp
>         add     w1, w1, 1
>         lsl     w1, w1, 4
>         sub     sp, sp, x1
>         mov     w0, wsp
>         bl      foo
>         mov     sp, x29
>         ldp     x29, x30, [sp], 16
>         ret
> 
> And we see similar results all the way back to GCC 6. So AFAICT this
> scan-assembler has never worked. The attached patch disables it on ILP32
> since this isn't a code quality regression.
> 
> This patch also fixes up the DejaGnu directives in extend-syntax.c to
> work on ILP32: we change the check-function-bodies directive to only run
> on LP64, adding scan-assembler directives for ILP32 where required.
> 
> OK for trunk?
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex

> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c
> index 23fa9f4ffc5..1bfcdb59dde 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/extend-syntax.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ unsigned long long *add1(unsigned long long *p, unsigned x)
>  */
>  unsigned long long add2(unsigned long long x, unsigned y)
>  {
> +  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "add\tx0, x0, w1, uxtw" 1 { target 
> ilp32 } } } */
>    return x + y;
>  }
>  
> @@ -34,6 +35,9 @@ double *add3(double *p, int x)
>    return p + x;
>  }
>  
> +// add1 and add3 should both generate this on ILP32:
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "add\tw0, w0, w1, lsl 3" 2 { target 
> ilp32 } } } */
> +
>  // Hits *sub_zero_extendsi_di (*sub_<optab><ALLX:mode>_<GPI:mode>).
>  /*
>  ** sub1:
> @@ -42,6 +46,7 @@ double *add3(double *p, int x)
>  */
>  unsigned long long sub1(unsigned long long x, unsigned n)
>  {
> +    /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "sub\tx0, x0, w1, uxtw" 1 { target 
> ilp32 } } } */
>      return x - n;
>  }
>  
> @@ -67,6 +72,9 @@ double *sub3(double *p, int n)
>    return p - n;
>  }
>  
> +// sub2 and sub3 should both generate this on ILP32:
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "sub\tw0, w0, w1, lsl 3" 2 { target 
> ilp32 } } } */
> +
>  // Hits *adds_zero_extendsi_di (*adds_<optab><ALLX:mode>_<GPI:mode>).
>  int adds1(unsigned long long x, unsigned y)
>  {
> @@ -97,7 +105,8 @@ int subs1(unsigned long long x, unsigned y)
>  unsigned long long *w;
>  int subs2(unsigned long long *x, int y)
>  {
> -  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "subs\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 
> w\[0-9\]+, sxtw 3" 1 } } */
> +  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "subs\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, 
> w\[0-9\]+, sxtw 3" 1 { target lp64 } } } */
> +  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "subs\tw\[0-9\]+, w\[0-9\]+, 
> w\[0-9\]+, lsl 3" 1 { target ilp32 } } } */
>    unsigned long long *t = x - y;
>    w = t;
>    return !!t;
> @@ -117,4 +126,4 @@ int cmp2(unsigned long long x, int y)
>    return x == ((unsigned long long)y << 3);
>  }
>  
> -/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" { target lp64 } } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/subsp.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/subsp.c
> index 341b83dca86..e7f61e0799b 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/subsp.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/subsp.c
> @@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ f2 (int *x, int y)
>  }
>  
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "sub\tsp, sp, x\[0-9\]*\n" } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "sub\tsp, sp, w\[0-9\]*, sxtw 4\n" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "sub\tsp, sp, w\[0-9\]*, sxtw 4\n" { target 
> lp64 } } } */

Reply via email to