Hi Gerald,
On 01/10/2012 12:31 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
@item Generic interface name, which have the same name as derived types,
"interface names", perhaps?
Well spotted - and corrected with the patched patch (Rev. 183062).
Thanks,
Tobias
Index: gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi (revision 183060)
+++ gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi (working copy)
@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ override type-bound procedures or to have deferred
@code{SAME_TYPE_AS}, @code{EXTENDS_TYPE_OF} and @code{SELECT TYPE}.
Note that unlimited polymophism is currently not supported.
-@item Generic interface name, which have the same name as derived types,
+@item Generic interface names, which have the same name as derived types,
are now supported. This allows one to write constructor functions. Note
that Fortran does not support static constructor functions. For static
variables, only default initialization or structure-constructor
Index: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/ChangeLog (revision 183061)
+++ gcc/fortran/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2012-01-10 Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com>
+
+ * gfortran.texi (Fortran 2003 Status): Fix grammar.
+
2012-01-10 Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de>
PR fortran/51652
