On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:38:21PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Ok for the trunk? (Build + "make pdf" tested)
> 
> Tobias

The two "which" clauses in the 1st sentence seem awkward.  How
about the following changes?  OK, after considering the suggested
changes.

+@item Generic interface name which have the same name as derived types are

comma between "name which" and "types are".

+now supported, which allows to write constructor functions. Note that

Change comma to period.  s/which allows/This allows one/

+Fortran does not support static constructor functions. For static
+variables, only default initialization or structure-constructor
+initialization are available.

The complete suggested change:

@item Generic interface name, which have the same name as derived types,
are now supported. This allows one to write constructor functions.  Note
that Fortran does not support static constructor functions.  For static
variables, only default initialization or structure-constructor
initialization are available.


-- 
Steve

Reply via email to