Hi Jakub,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
> Sent: 10 September 2020 09:51
> To: Richard Earnshaw <richard.earns...@foss.arm.com>; Kyrylo Tkachov
> <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH] arm: Fix up arm_override_options_after_change_1
> 
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:45:12AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Looking further at arm_override_options_after_change_1, it also seems to
> be
> > incorrect, rather than testing
> > !opts->x_str_align_functions
> > it should be really testing
> > !opts_set->x_str_align_functions
> > and get &global_options_set or similar passed to it as additional opts_set
> > argument.  That is because otherwise the decision will be sticky, while it
> > should be done whenever use provided -falign-functions but didn't provide
> > -falign-functions= (either on the command line, or through optimize
> > attribute or pragma).
> 
> Here is a fix for that (incremental change on top of the previous patch).
> Bootstrapped/regtested on armv7hl-linux-gnueabi, ok for trunk?

This looks ok to me.
Please commit to master so we can get some wider testing before backporting.

Thanks,
Kyrill

> 
> 2020-09-10  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       * config/arm/arm.c (arm_override_options_after_change_1): Add
> opts_set
>       argument, test opts_set->x_str_align_functions rather than
>       opts->x_str_align_functions.
>       (arm_override_options_after_change, arm_option_override_internal,
>       arm_set_current_function): Adjust callers.
> 
> --- gcc/config/arm/arm.c.jj   2020-09-09 09:19:42.911419411 +0200
> +++ gcc/config/arm/arm.c      2020-09-09 09:28:02.392897384 +0200
> @@ -3024,10 +3024,11 @@ static GTY(()) bool thumb_flipper;
>  static GTY(()) tree init_optimize;
> 
>  static void
> -arm_override_options_after_change_1 (struct gcc_options *opts)
> +arm_override_options_after_change_1 (struct gcc_options *opts,
> +                                  struct gcc_options *opts_set)
>  {
>    /* -falign-functions without argument: supply one.  */
> -  if (opts->x_flag_align_functions && !opts->x_str_align_functions)
> +  if (opts->x_flag_align_functions && !opts_set->x_str_align_functions)
>      opts->x_str_align_functions = TARGET_THUMB_P (opts->x_target_flags)
>        && opts->x_optimize_size ? "2" : "4";
>  }
> @@ -3037,7 +3038,7 @@ arm_override_options_after_change_1 (str
>  static void
>  arm_override_options_after_change (void)
>  {
> -  arm_override_options_after_change_1 (&global_options);
> +  arm_override_options_after_change_1 (&global_options,
> &global_options_set);
>  }
> 
>  /* Implement TARGET_OPTION_SAVE.  */
> @@ -3065,7 +3066,7 @@ static void
>  arm_option_override_internal (struct gcc_options *opts,
>                             struct gcc_options *opts_set)
>  {
> -  arm_override_options_after_change_1 (opts);
> +  arm_override_options_after_change_1 (opts, opts_set);
> 
>    if (TARGET_INTERWORK && !bitmap_bit_p (arm_active_target.isa,
> isa_bit_thumb))
>      {
> @@ -32335,7 +32336,7 @@ arm_set_current_function (tree fndecl)
> 
>    save_restore_target_globals (new_tree);
> 
> -  arm_override_options_after_change_1 (&global_options);
> +  arm_override_options_after_change_1 (&global_options,
> &global_options_set);
>  }
> 
>  /* Implement TARGET_OPTION_PRINT.  */
> 
> 
>       Jakub

Reply via email to