Hi Richard

Thank you very much.

Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> writes:
>Hi Qian,
>
>"Qian, Jianhua" <qia...@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
>> Hi Richard
>> 
>>> Would you like the patch to be backported further than GCC 10?
>> That is good if it could be backported to GCC9.
>
>Sure, now done.
>
>>> Does the attached patch to document the addition to GCC 10.3 look OK?
>> To avoid misunderstanding, could you please remove "for a 512-bit vector 
>> length"?
>
>Yeah, that's fine.  Here's what I committed to gcc-10/changes.html, with the 
>same wording for gcc-9/changes.html.
>
>Thanks,
>Richard

Regards,
Qian



Reply via email to