Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)

[Brendan Conoboy]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This is ok for 4.6 if it has been sufficiently tested.

Okay!  Is there any testing you'd like to see beyond the
aforementioned success with arm and x86_64 linux?

-Brendan