Re: [google] Backport r171347 and r181549 from trunk (strict volatile bitfield) (issue5434084)

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:35:29PM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Anyone?

This is ok for 4.6 if it has been sufficiently tested.

        Jakub