Re: [patch] PR51347 alias problem

[Aldy Hernandez]

This is not correct. First, _ITM_getTMCloneOrIrrevocable should never
appear in a __transaction_atomic (_ITM_getTMClone is ok).
But the problem here is that it fails to detect the clone because of the
alias. This is why we end up with a call to _ITM_getTMCloneOrIrrevocable.

Ah, I see.

Please open a new PR for this.  This is something completely different 
from the aforementioned PR.  CC me or assign it to me, I will take a look.

Thanks.