On 12/10/11 17:13, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 12/10/2011 02:16 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Using the parent node for aliases (as in your patch) makes sense, but I
don't see tree_function_versioning() segfaulting as you claim. What I
see is estimate_function_body_sizes()
Humm you are seeing this I guess:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00427.html
When applied, you should probably see the tree_function_versioning problem.
Indeed. This is what I am seeing. I have applied and committed the
patch and can no longer reproduce the problem.
Can you verify on your end, and close the bug if appropriate?
Thanks for all your help here.
