On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Michael Zolotukhin <michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd just duplicate the tests you want to change to a larger array >> size and change those duplicates accordingly, leaving the original >> tests alone. > Richard, I made the tests this way - please check them in the attached > patch (it happened to be quite big).
Works for me. Thanks, Richard. >> There is vect_multiple_sizes for such cases. > Ira, thanks! This flag would be useful to avoid fails on the original > tests when they are compiled with mavx/mavx2 - I'll prepare a patch > for this soon. > > On 5 December 2011 13:10, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Ira Rosen <i...@il.ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org wrote on 05/12/2011 10:39:07 AM: >>> >>>> From: Michael Zolotukhin <michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com> >>>> To: Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> >>>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, izamya...@gmail.com >>>> Date: 05/12/2011 10:39 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [Patch] Increase array sizes in vect-tests to enable >>>> 256-bit vectorization >>>> Sent by: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org >>>> >>>> On 5 December 2011 10:14, Michael Zolotukhin >>>> <michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > Ok, will several tests with short arrays be enough for that or should >>>> > we keep all the original tests plus new ones with longer arrays? >>>> >>>> BTW, there is another problem with current tests with short arrays - >>>> scans are expecting specific number of some diagnostic messages like >>>> "not vectorized: unsupported unaligned store", and that number would >>>> be different if several vector-lengths are available - so we'll have >>>> fails in those tests. >>> >>> There is vect_multiple_sizes for such cases. >> >> I'd just duplicate the tests you want to change to a larger array >> size and change those duplicates accordingly, leaving the original >> tests alone. >> >> Richard. > > > > -- > --- > Best regards, > Michael V. Zolotukhin, > Software Engineer > Intel Corporation.