On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Ira Rosen <i...@il.ibm.com> wrote: > > > gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org wrote on 05/12/2011 10:39:07 AM: > >> From: Michael Zolotukhin <michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com> >> To: Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, izamya...@gmail.com >> Date: 05/12/2011 10:39 AM >> Subject: Re: [Patch] Increase array sizes in vect-tests to enable >> 256-bit vectorization >> Sent by: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org >> >> On 5 December 2011 10:14, Michael Zolotukhin >> <michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Ok, will several tests with short arrays be enough for that or should >> > we keep all the original tests plus new ones with longer arrays? >> >> BTW, there is another problem with current tests with short arrays - >> scans are expecting specific number of some diagnostic messages like >> "not vectorized: unsupported unaligned store", and that number would >> be different if several vector-lengths are available - so we'll have >> fails in those tests. > > There is vect_multiple_sizes for such cases.
I'd just duplicate the tests you want to change to a larger array size and change those duplicates accordingly, leaving the original tests alone. Richard.
