On 10/10/19 7:37 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Not sure whether this is supposed to be a living document or just a
record of what the mission statement was when egcs became GCC. The
date at the top is still 1999-04-22.
Ah, I hadn't considered that. Good thing I didn't get around to
committing it just yet.
Gerald, do you happen to know?
Yes, this is not really a living document, but more reference
(though those bits generally are still revelant).
Looking at your patch, indeed CVS is something less and less
known, and CVS vs whatever else wasn't the point, so how about
if we go with your proposal and just write "[version control]",
i.e., with the angle brackets commonly used in quotes to indicate
when something is not verbatim, but adjusted for context?
Surely would be fine with me.
I see, thanks. Here's a proposed patch then.
Thanks,
Kyrill
Thanks,
Gerald
commit 012506e26d5ba2d5dd3ddd2f58aeafce9c532bbf
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
Date: Wed Oct 9 16:15:00 2019 +0100
[gcccmission.html] Replace cvs with version control
diff --git a/htdocs/gccmission.html b/htdocs/gccmission.html
index 25aa3ad0..8d4b5757 100644
--- a/htdocs/gccmission.html
+++ b/htdocs/gccmission.html
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ GCC.</p>
as long as they accept the groundrules.</li>
</ul></li>
<li>Open mailing lists.</li>
-<li>Developer friendly tools and procedures (i.e., cvs, multiple
+<li>Developer friendly tools and procedures (i.e. [version control], multiple
maintainers, etc).</li>
<li>Conflicts of interest exist for many GCC developers; the
developers as well as the <a href="steering.html">GCC Steering
