On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > This is a tad rough, but not too bad.
Cool. Maybe I don't understand what they are suppose to represent, but why the choice of values for cacheline size? Is that suppose to be a value chosen by ITM or suppose to be the hardware cacheline used as the granularity for transactions? Thanks, David
