On 9/23/19 8:52 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 22 September 2019 22:51:46 CEST, Jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@charter.net> wrote:
Hi all,
The attached patch eliminates several warnings by adjusting which
enumerator is
used in the subject offending code. I fixed this by adding an
enumerator at the
end of the file_mode definition. This then triggered a warning in
several other
places for an unhandled case in the switch statements. I cleared those
by
throwing in an assert (false) since it cant happen unless something
really goes
wrong somehow.
I'm curious why you assert (false) instead of the usual gcc_unreachable ()?
Thanks,
Because I forgot all about gcc_unreachable. I will give it a try.
Jerry
