On 22 September 2019 22:51:46 CEST, Jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@charter.net> wrote: >Hi all, > >The attached patch eliminates several warnings by adjusting which >enumerator is >used in the subject offending code. I fixed this by adding an >enumerator at the >end of the file_mode definition. This then triggered a warning in >several other >places for an unhandled case in the switch statements. I cleared those >by >throwing in an assert (false) since it cant happen unless something >really goes >wrong somehow. > I'm curious why you assert (false) instead of the usual gcc_unreachable ()?
Thanks,
