On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 5:34 AM Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 3/28/19 1:38 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:47 AM Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Uros: > >> would you help to review this patch? > > > > This is AVX512F patch, you will need the approval from the maintainer > > first. I have no plans to maintain AVX512 beyond rubber-stamping OK > > dead obvious regression from a reputable contributors. It is simply > > too much involvment for me. If the appointed maintainer doesn't > > respond anymore, then I suggest you raise the issue with GCC steering > > committe. > Also note, this is not fixing a regression relative to a prior release. > I'd prefer to see this moved to gcc-10 unless there is a strong > justification for pushing it into gcc-9. > > The subject like should also be changed to reference the right bz. I > think the right one is 89803. > > jeff
Yes, it's PR 89803, sorry for typo. And thank you for you explanation. -- BR, Hongtao
