On 3/28/19 1:38 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:47 AM Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Uros: >> would you help to review this patch? > > This is AVX512F patch, you will need the approval from the maintainer > first. I have no plans to maintain AVX512 beyond rubber-stamping OK > dead obvious regression from a reputable contributors. It is simply > too much involvment for me. If the appointed maintainer doesn't > respond anymore, then I suggest you raise the issue with GCC steering > committe. Also note, this is not fixing a regression relative to a prior release. I'd prefer to see this moved to gcc-10 unless there is a strong justification for pushing it into gcc-9.
The subject like should also be changed to reference the right bz. I think the right one is 89803. jeff
