On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 07:15:20PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 12:10:56PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 04:38:16PM +0000, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > v2, with the input from Joseph taken into account. > > > > > > This is the same "asm inline" patch as before, but now preceded by a > > > patch that makes all orderings of volatile/goto/inline valid, all other > > > type qualifiers invalid, all repetitions of qualifiers invalid. > > > > Committed now, with everyone's suggestions addressed. > > > > Is this okay for backport to 8? Maybe 7? After a week or so, of course. > > This will help the Linux people to use it sooner. > > Not sure if in the backport we shouldn't keep accepting with warning like > before const asm and not do the changes of accepting in any order except > perhaps for the inline keyword in there?
Okay, I'll edit the const (etc.) back in. The "any order" is easier to keep this way I think (and doesn't change anything for code that was already accepted). Segher
