On Thu, 6 Dec 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Not sure if in the backport we shouldn't keep accepting with warning like > before const asm and not do the changes of accepting in any order except > perhaps for the inline keyword in there?
Indeed, I think it's best to keep accepting const and restrict in asm for any backports, to avoid breaking any existing code with those constructs with a release branch change. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
