Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> writes:
> Hi Martin,
>
>> On 11/26/18 10:52 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>>> I have now committed this patch as r266418.
>>>
>>> this patch has created a bunch of XPASSes everywhere:
>>>
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 119)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 120)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 116)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 117)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 84)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/user-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for warnings,
>>> line 110)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/user-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for warnings,
>>> line 142)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/user-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for warnings,
>>> line 143)
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up. I like those much better than FAILs :)
>
> fully agreed ;-) However, at some point too many XFAILs make the real
XPASSes, of course...
> problems harder to spot in mail-report.log...
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
